Does politics
need to include third parties?
George
Horsley Smith and Richard P. Davis.The Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol.
11, No. 2 (Summer, 1947), pp. 236-243. March 5, 2015.
Smith and Davis
pose an important question, do the voters want the parties to change? If the
answer is yes, they see these as the two solutions: “a) form a third party to
take care of the putatively large number of American progressives; or b) Using
the present framework, form two major parties so as to offer clearly-marked
vehicles for liberal and conservative travelers”(237). They conducted a series of tests to find out
how voters feel about the parties and if things needed to be changed. When they
were polled, the United States had just finished one of the most polarizing
periods in history, the New Deal. Even after this period of history a small
percentage of voters wanted to change the two party system. They continue on,
by looking at history. Only a handful of instances have third parties
successfully won an election. They also tested a variety of demographics and
the data proved continual. No matter the occupation, education, or
socio-economic status, a few amount of people would leave their party for a
newly formed one. In general Smith and Davis show that, in reality, third
parties are not needed in American government.
If voters are
happy with the two parties maybe it’s not the candidates that are becoming more
partisan. In reality, maybe the candidates are a fair representation of how American
voters feel. If it has always been this way, why is there a need to change things?
In 2015, American government is clouded with inactivity and 2 party issues and
people see third parties as the solution. What is not usually seen is the
representation of the people. If voters are satisfied with their ideology and
the way they are being represented in the government, then third parties will
not be right for the people. Maybe there is a reason that third parties aren’t
frequently elected.
The main question becomes, are third parties
important to America’s political system? According to Nader and Amato, “Our
two-party system is engaged in an unfair restraint of democratic participated”(171).
On the other hand, Davis and Smith believe, “People are probably cynical about
political parties”(239), making it very unlikely that voters would be
enthusiastic about adding another. Although both sources appreciate democracy,
they disagree when it comes to how many parties should be on the ballot. Nader
and Amato see third party’s unpopularity as disrupting democracy but Davis and
Smith see it as the voters speaking their minds.
After seeing both sides, I will look
further into why third parties aren’t popular. This will even out my pro and
con sources.
No comments:
Post a Comment